when-one-complaint-is-maintainable for 10 dishonored cheque-

http://www.lawweb.in/2015/11/when-one-complaint-is-maintainable-in.html?m=1

summons-e-mail-well-138-cases-sc-issues-guidelines-speedy-expeditious-trial-cheque-bouncing-cases/

http://www.livelaw.in/issue-summons-e-mail-well-138-cases-sc-issues-guidelines-speedy-expeditious-trial-cheque-bouncing-cases/#.WZlV_3hdM_o.whatsapp

Without Producing The Cheque Before The Drawer Bank Complaint Under Sec.138 NI Act Not Maintainanble- Calcutta High Court

Without Producing The Cheque Before The Drawer Bank Complaint Under Sec.138 NI Act Not Maintainanble- Calcutta High Court [Read Order]

Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/without-producing-cheque-drawer-bank-complaint-sec-138-ni-act-not-maintainanble-calcutta-high-court-read-order/

Accidental Death & Compensation: (Income Tax Return Required) Knowledge is Power.... If a person has an accidental death and the person was filing income tax returns for the last three years, then the government is obliged to give ten times the average annual income of the last three years to that person's family.

Accidental Death & Compensation:
(Income Tax Return Required)
Knowledge is Power....
If a person has an accidental death and the person was filing income tax returns for the last three years, then the government is obliged to give ten times the average annual income of the last three years to that person's family.
Yes, you will be surprised by this, but this is right and it is Government rule.
For example, if someone's annual income is  4 lakh 5 lakhs and 6 lakhs in the first, second and third years respectively, its average income is ten times of five lakhs.. means fifty Lac rupees, family of that person is entitled to receive from the Government.
In the absence of much information, people do not take this claim with the Government.
If any return is missing, mainly last three years, this could lower the claim amount or even no claim because court takes ITR as only evidence.
NO wealth record, FD's; business etc. is given that much importance as compared to ITR in the eyes of law.
Many a time,  people do not file ITRs regularly..or it will be taken lightly..
Due to lack of information the family receives no economic benefits.

Source - forwarded
Section 166 of the Motor act, 1988 (Supreme Court Judgment under Civil/ Appeal No. 9858 of 2013, arising out of SLP (c) No. 1056 of 2008) Dt. 31 Oct. 2013.
Shared by: Advocate MAdaNmohan Mishra,9022212007, Law Bonds 26Goregoan west, Mumbai-104

Spread the word. Let someone's family benefit.

Section 173(1) - Compensation - Enhancement - income of claimant has been taken as prescribed amount per month, compensation to be granted under head loss of income during period of treatment also needs to be enhanced consequentially

: Motor Vehicles Act 1988 - Section 173(1) - Compensation - Enhancement - income of claimant has been taken as prescribed amount per month, compensation to be granted under head loss of income during period of treatment also needs to be enhanced consequentially - There is no change with regard to compensation granted under other conventional heads because amount awarded under these heads appears to be just and proper - Claimant was entitled to    compensation of prescribed amount - judgment and award passed by Tribunal, was modified. [Veerabhadragouda & Another Versus Lakshmanna & Others, The Honourable Dr. Justice Vineet Kothari & The Honourable Mr. Justice Sreenivas Harish Kumar, Dt: 07-03-2017, CDJ 2017 Kar HC 414]

MV Act - Section 173(1) – Compensation – Enhancement - Court has consistently held that even for coolie in prescribed year, minimum wages that was being paid, his income would not be less than prescribed amount per month, Court are inclined to adopt same as income of claimant to compute compensation towards 'loss of future income' - compensation towards 'loss of income during laid-up period' also requires to be re-computed - Claimant would be entitled to additional compensation. [Shantappa Versus Adul Rahman & Another, The Honourable Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar & The Honourable Mr. Justice    B.A. Patil, Dt: 20-02-2017, CDJ 2017 Kar HC 415]
[8/23, 9:26 AM] Vpselvaraju: Unauthorized Construction - First Respondent had submitted that ground floor was constructed prior to prescribed year - Alleged construction on said ground floor cannot be taken as violation in terms of regulation issued later - Director, Town and Country Planning is directed to consider appeal and contentions filed by First Respondent after affording opportunity for hearing to Respondents as well as Appellant and pass appropriate orders as per law - None of observations of Impugned orders shall stand in way of Director, Town and Country Planning form passing order on merits - Appellant is restrained from taking coercive steps against Respondent in respect of alleged unauthorized construction - Director, Town and Country Planning to pass orders expeditiously, within prescribed period. [Commissioner, Corporation Of Madurai Versus Dr. I. Ismail & Others, The Honourable Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph & The Honourable Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi, Dt: 02-08-2017, CDJ 2017 SC 906]

No Insurance Renewal Without Valid Pollution Certificate: SC.

No Insurance Renewal Without Valid Pollution Certificate: SC...

Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/no-insurance-renewal-without-valid-pollution-certificate-sc/

SC Levies Exemplary Costs Of Rs. 1 Lakh For Delayed Settlement Of Cheque Bounce Case [

SC Levies Exemplary Costs Of Rs. 1 Lakh For Delayed Settlement Of Cheque Bounce Case [Read Judgment]...

Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/sc-levies-exemplary-costs-rs-1-lakh-delayed-settlement-cheque-bounce-case-read-judgment/