My title page contents
http://dubai-best-hotels.blogspot.com/ google-site-verification: google1aa22a1d53730cd9.html

Monday, May 8, 2023

revenue recovery proceedings were initiated against you in a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) Execution Petition (EP) case in 2019, in which you did not participate (ex-parte).

As per the given information, it appears that revenue recovery proceedings were initiated against you in a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) Execution Petition (EP) case in 2019, in which you did not participate (ex-parte).

Firstly, it is advised that you consult with a lawyer experienced in revenue recovery proceedings to assess the details of the case and suggest appropriate legal remedies.

As per the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order XXI, Rule 11, if a decree-holder fails to get the decree executed within 12 years from the date of the decree, the courts lose jurisdiction to execute such decrees. It is important to check if the decree holder has executed the decree within the given time frame.

Furthermore, you can also file an application under Order IX, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for setting aside the ex-parte order. This application must be filed within 30 days of the date of the order or within such further time as the court may allow.

In addition, you can also explore the possibility of settling the issue through negotiations with the decree-holder. You may try to come to a mutually-beneficial settlement that resolves the issue amicably.

It should be noted that the specific laws and jurisdiction governing the revenue recovery proceedings may vary depending on the location of the MACT case. Therefore, it is recommended that you take the advice of a lawyer experienced in handling such cases in your specific jurisdiction.